Abbott's youthful ( conservative ) paper upon the
errors of floating the dollar in hindsight is notable. Our dollar has traded
from 56c to 1.13 since, devastating many an industry amidst such instability.
The floating dollar does raise serious issues.
The biggest of which is that every player is in it
for themselves. And big financiers do mighty well out of such variable floating
currencies, pushing one way then the other, making waves then plundering the
instabilities.
Our high dollar has now wiped out much of our
agriculture and agricultural processing, our manufacturing, ford holden
.
It has risen from excess capital in US markets via
low interest rates, pushing commodity prices into bubble zones. Profits for wallstreet bankers, disasters for the farmers and industrialists on the other side of the deals.
Then our dollar follows - bubble zones, till many
industries are unsustainable.
We could have kept our dollar down with the right
intentions and practises.
Right intentions? Selfish accumulation or seeking balance and common good?
Printing of money weakens currencies and incites
inflation. For the latter reason it has largely been tabooed.
But where one considers and works with Steiner's
solution - gift money - inflation need not take hold. Concievably printing money
could have moderated our overblown currency, saving many of the industries lost
over the last 5 to 7 years. Inflation would have gone through the roof is the
argument against but had we significantly gifted support to needful countries,
making lifelong friends, building global stability,mutual interest and respect,
inflation imaginably needn't have emerged, let alone devastated.
Even now, were the government to use such gift
impulses, in the form of vehicles, cars and parts for East Timor (bug free), New Guinea, Malaysia, India,Vietnam, Maldives, Africa......contracted into the future we
could stabilise our industries. Similarly for bottled fruit, or for canned
vegetables, for milk or for cheeses.
We have vast Intellectual advances and could also
offer much as aid to Afghanistan or Iraq, medicine, agriculture,
infrastructure.
The quest for sound government, for harmonious
relations, is to look beyond the three year electoral cycle to the five, ten,
fifteen and thirty year cycles, aiming not for corporate profits, but for
commonwealth, for balancing, for global stability.
We need citizens with similar understanding if we want democracy to realise such developments.
No comments:
Post a Comment